The North West Shelf Extension and What It Means for Environmental Investors
In a move that has stirred both market confidence and environmental criticism, the Albanese Government has approved a revised environment plan that will allow Woodside Energy to continue operating the North West Shelf Gas Project out to 2070. (1) This decision gives one of Australia’s oldest and largest LNG facilities a much longer runway – with major implications for both the climate and capital markets.
What Was Approved
Under the revised plan, Woodside can keep the Karratha Gas Plant running and process third-party gas, not just from its original offshore fields, but from others piped into the facility. This was confirmed by Minister for Climate Change and Energy Chris Bowen and Minister for Resources Madeleine King in a joint statement, noting that the decision was consistent with updated offshore environment regulations and NOPSEMA’s assessment protocols.
This is not about new gas developments. It’s about extracting more value from already-built infrastructure. But the consequences are significant. As reported by Adam Morton in The Guardian, and supported by The Australian Financial Review, the extension could facilitate the release of an additional 4.3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2070 – an emissions figure equivalent to nearly a decade of Australia’s domestic emissions. (2)(3)(4)
No Gas for the East Coast
Despite being framed by some as an energy security measure, the extension does not contribute to domestic supply on the eastern seaboard. Every molecule of gas processed through the North West Shelf under the extended timeline will be destined for international export, primarily to Asian markets.
As both The Guardian and the AFR note, this decision does not address domestic supply issues or power prices. It merely extends Australia's role as an LNG exporter.
Environmental Concerns
Environmental groups were quick to condemn the move. The Conservation Council of WA (CCWA) labelled the decision a "climate disaster." (5) CCWA Executive Director Maggie Wood warned that the project undermines Australia’s climate commitments and said it would continue to produce massive emissions well beyond the country’s legislated net-zero target.
The Australian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) also criticised the government, arguing the extension undermines investor confidence in the integrity of Australia’s climate policies.
Government and Media Defence
Senator Murray Watt offered a defence, stating the decision was about protecting jobs, supporting regional communities, and providing energy to key trading partners. Watt emphasised that the approval was based on updated, stricter environmental standards and that abandoning the project would not stop global demand for gas – it would simply shift supply elsewhere.
We have to note the economic importance of the project, noting the role LNG plays in Australia's trade balance and the geopolitical relevance of gas exports to Asia. Also the federal government's tightrope walk between global climate goals and domestic economic management.
Supporters of the decision argue that it reflects a realistic approach to the energy transition, maintaining energy exports and economic benefits while attempting to regulate and limit environmental damage through improved oversight.
The Market Response
The market responded positively. Woodside’s share price saw a modest lift after the announcement, reflecting investor approval for the certainty and revenue continuation the project extension provides. For shareholders, the project’s extended life enhances the value of legacy assets and reduces near-term decommissioning costs.
That said prior to the announcement WDS’ share price was at 3.5 year lows, and over 10 years has gone backwards (excluding dividends). While this extension is obviously a positive for them in the short term, it doesn’t change the long-term narrative.
From an investment perspective, the key takeaway is that regulatory certainty matters. Even where the emissions profile is high, markets reward clarity, consistency, and cash flows. But it also places more pressure on Woodside to demonstrate emissions reduction strategies, including potential carbon capture or offsets.
What This Means for Climate-Focused Investors
For environmental and sustainability-minded investors, this decision is not the end of the story. Rather, it reinforces a recurring theme: climate policy and energy reality are often out of step.
The federal government continues to support renewables and has advanced transmission projects, hydrogen hubs, and battery storage facilities. The 2025-26 Federal Budget includes funding for climate resilience.
While the North West Shelf decision is a win for fossil infrastructure, the longer-term investment trends still favour decarbonisation.
Key Signals for Investors
Watch Woodside’s emissions commitments: How it plans to manage or offset the emissions from this facility will be closely scrutinised.
Differentiate export-led fossil projects from domestic energy investments: The former may have policy support but limited upside for energy transition portfolios.
Focus on structural enablers of transition: Grid infrastructure, clean energy supply chains, and nature-based solutions remain central to long-term climate strategies.
Expect inconsistencies: Policy will remain politically constrained, but capital markets are increasingly climate-aligned.
The Bottom Line
The Albanese Government’s decision to extend the North West Shelf was not a shift in climate direction – it was a continuation of Australia’s balancing act between economic reliance on fossil fuel exports and its global climate commitments. It may frustrate campaigners, but for investors, the message is clearer: don’t follow the rhetoric. Follow the regulatory approvals, the balance sheets, and the climate-adjusted capital flows. The transition is still happening. This decision just reminds us that it won’t always be linear.
References
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (2025). Statement on the North West Shelf Gas Processing Project. https://minister.dcceew.gov.au/watt/media-releases/statement-north-west-shelf-gas-processing-project
Adam Morton. The Guardian “Albanese government approves massive Woodside North West Shelf development” https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/28/labor-approves-extension-of-woodsides-contentious-north-west-shelf-gas-development
Jennifer Hewitt, Australian Financial Review “Watt makes the only choice on Woodside” 28 May 2025 https://www.afr.com/companies/energy/watt-makes-the-only-choice-on-woodside-20250528-p5m2x4
Tom Rabe and Ryan Cropp, Australian Financial Review “NW Shelf extension confirms Labor’s gas conversion” 28 May 2025 https://www.afr.com/companies/energy/world-heritage-listing-in-doubt-if-labor-extends-north-west-shelf-20250528-p5m2up
Conservation Council of WA. “Media Statement – North West Shelf gas project.” 28 May 2025 https://www.ccwa.org.au/north_west_shelf_gas_project
Important Information
EnviroInvest Pty Ltd ACN 685 107 957 (“EnviroInvest”) is an Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ACN 633 984 773 (“DFGPL”) which is the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFS Licence No. 521404).
Information in this commentary is current as at date prepared unless otherwise stated. However, please bear in mind that investments can go up or down in value, and that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. For more Important Information please refer to the Disclaimer section of this website.
This communication may contain general financial product advice. It has been prepared without taking into account your personal circumstances, and you should therefore consider its appropriateness in light of your objectives, financial circumstances and needs before acting on it.
If our advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a particular financial product, you should obtain a copy of and consider the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) before making any decision.