IGCC’s 2025 Annual Report and Strategy 2030: What It Means for Investors
The Annual Report (1) and the Strategy 2030 (2) reports were both released by the Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC) in February 2026. Read together, they provide something more useful than a standard year-in-review. They show how Australia and New Zealand’s largest institutional investors are shifting from climate commitments to implementation, and where capital is expected to move over the next five years.
IGCC now represents investors with almost $5 trillion in assets under local management, covering more than 15 million beneficiaries. This is not fringe ESG commentary. It is mainstream capital positioning.
What the 2025 Annual Report Shows
The Annual Report is structured around IGCC’s three core workstreams: Policy and Advocacy, Investor Practice, and Corporate Engagement, with cross-cutting themes of physical risk and just transition.
Several themes stand out.
First, policy momentum has stabilised. 2025 saw Australia set its 2035 emissions target at 62 to 70 percent below 2005 levels. The report makes clear that investors viewed this as foundational for long-term capital allocation certainty. The Climate Action Pays Off campaign reached four million Australians and directly influenced the policy debate. Investors were not passive observers. They were active participants in shaping the operating environment.
Second, investor practice has shifted from disclosure to delivery. According to the Climate Practice Indicators section, attention is moving toward transition plan implementation, physical risk integration and governance quality. Reporting frameworks such as TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) and ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board) are now baseline expectations. The harder work is capital allocation alignment and resilience.
Third, corporate engagement is becoming more systemic. IGCC’s guidance on board climate capability and capital allocation reflects a recognition that the “easy wins” in corporate decarbonisation are largely done. The next phase requires governance reform, credible transition plans and sector-level coordination. Investors are increasingly focused on whether boards are equipped to manage climate risk as a financial risk, not a reputational issue.
Fourth, physical risk is no longer theoretical. The Annual Report highlights severe floods, droughts and typhoons across the region, alongside the release of Australia’s first National Climate Risk Assessment and National Adaptation Plan. Investors are demanding decision-useful risk assessments and clearer resilience roadmaps. Adaptation is now an investable theme, not simply a defensive one.
Finally, the just transition has matured from principle to practice. Case studies such as Aware Super’s evaluation framework for corporate just transition planning demonstrate that social licence and distributional impacts are being integrated into engagement and stewardship processes. Investors recognise that disorderly transitions create systemic financial risk.
In short, the Annual Report confirms that climate is embedded in fiduciary thinking.
Strategy 2030: The Forward Plan
The Strategy 2030 document provides the roadmap.
Its vision is simple: a climate-resilient economy on track for net zero by 2050. Its five strategic themes are equally clear:
Accelerating the energy transition
Driving down emissions in the real economy
Addressing physical climate risk impacts
Driving investment in climate solutions
Supporting regional decarbonisation
The economic framing is notable. The strategy highlights that a disorderly 3°C pathway could reduce superannuation returns by 38 percent by 2050 and push disaster costs materially higher. Conversely, an orderly net zero transition is associated with higher GDP, job creation, export growth and strong adaptation returns. Climate action is presented as the least-cost pathway.
For investors, the implications are practical.
Energy transition capital will need to replace ageing coal assets, modernise grids, scale storage and support electrification. Real economy decarbonisation will require engagement in heavy industry, transport and hard-to-abate sectors. Physical risk will demand infrastructure resilience and adaptation finance. Climate solutions investment will require patient capital and policy-enabled innovation. Regional decarbonisation, particularly in Asia, will open new capital flows for those with expertise and risk tolerance.
The strategy also sets institutional ambitions: 80 percent participation of major institutional investors in the IGCC network, Paris-aligned strategies across members, and systematic engagement with ASX100 and key NZX companies to ensure 1.5°C alignment.
This is coordination at scale.
How Investors Should Be Positioned
There are three clear positioning implications.
First, capital allocation needs to move from signalling to substance. Transition plans must be reflected in portfolio construction, strategic asset allocation and manager mandates. Investors who treat climate as a reporting overlay will fall behind those integrating it into core risk and return models.
Second, physical risk and resilience deserve standalone attention. Infrastructure, real assets, agriculture, insurance-linked securities and adaptation technologies are likely to see structural demand growth. Returns in these areas will increasingly reflect climate exposure and preparedness. The Strategy 2030 emphasis on resilience reinforces this as a multi-decade theme.
Third, policy alignment is now part of fiduciary practice. IGCC’s work shows that investors are shaping regulatory frameworks, disclosure regimes and sector plans. Understanding policy trajectories is essential to pricing risk and opportunity. Capital should be positioned in jurisdictions and sectors where durable legislative frameworks support decarbonisation and resilience.
The overarching message from both documents is that climate risk is systemic and capital is responding systemically. Investors who remain reactive will struggle to capture the structural growth embedded in the transition. Those who align early with credible policy, governance and implementation pathways are more likely to benefit from the repricing underway.
The Bottom Line
The IGCC Annual Report and Strategy 2030 confirm that climate is no longer an ESG subset. It is a core determinant of long-term economic performance and capital allocation.
Policy is firming. Governance expectations are rising. Physical risk is intensifying. Capital is coordinating.
For investors, the question is no longer whether to engage with the transition, but how effectively and how early. Those positioned for an orderly, resilient net zero pathway are positioning for structural growth. Those who are not may find that the cost of delay is measured not only in degrees, but in returns.
References
Investor Group on Climate Change. Annual Report 2025: Investors’ Progress in a Year of Global Turmoil. 19 February 2026. https://igcc.org.au/annual-report-2025-investors-progress-through-a-year-of-global-turmoil/
Investor Group on Climate Change. IGCC’s 2030 Strategy: A Clear Plan For This Decade. 19 February 2026. https://igcc.org.au/igcc-2030-strategy
Important Information
EnviroInvest Pty Ltd ACN 685 107 957 (“EnviroInvest”) is an Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ACN 633 984 773 (“DFGPL”) which is the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFS Licence No. 521404).
Information in this commentary is current as at date prepared unless otherwise stated. However, please bear in mind that investments can go up or down in value, and that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. For more Important Information please refer to the Disclaimer section of this website.
This communication may contain general financial product advice. It has been prepared without taking into account your personal circumstances, and you should therefore consider its appropriateness in light of your objectives, financial circumstances and needs before acting on it.
If our advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a particular financial product, you should obtain a copy of and consider the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) before making any decision.