Budget Reply 25–26: A Quiet Night for Environmental Investing
The 2025–26 Budget Reply presented a range of proposals aimed at easing financial pressure on Australians. Cost-of-living relief, support for apprenticeships, housing supply, and small business were all given time and attention. But for those looking for direction on climate, sustainability, and the green economy, the response was notably quiet.
While much of the national conversation has centred on household relief, investors focused on environmental assets were left scanning for detail—and found very little. 1
A Narrow Economic Focus
The Budget Reply focused heavily on short-term affordability measures, particularly through the proposed halving of the fuel excise for 12 months. This initiative may provide short-term savings for many drivers and businesses but doesn't speak to the broader shift underway in global transport, energy and industry.
In a year marked by escalating climate impacts, growing demand for emissions reporting, and surging global investment in clean energy and decarbonisation, the speech offered few insights into how environmental sectors fit into Australia’s economic roadmap.
For those investing in renewable energy, clean manufacturing, carbon markets, or sustainable agriculture, clarity and consistency are key. A major fiscal announcement that makes no mention of these themes is difficult to interpret as anything other than a missed opportunity.
No Mention of Net Zero or Emissions Reduction
The Budget Reply did not include references to net zero emissions, decarbonisation pathways, or emissions reduction frameworks. For sectors already transitioning—such as construction, energy, transport and primary production—this absence leaves open questions about future alignment with Australia’s climate commitments.
It also adds uncertainty for private investors trying to assess risk in long-term environmental projects. Whether in reforestation, ecosystem restoration, clean energy, or low-carbon infrastructure, large-scale environmental investing often relies on credible, consistent policy support. Even a short acknowledgement of national targets or transition planning can help provide that certainty.
Limited Support Signals for Emerging Sectors
Australia’s potential in critical minerals, battery supply chains, green steel, and clean hydrogen is well established. These are the sectors attracting global attention and investment—and where Australia has a genuine competitive advantage.
However, the Budget Reply did not touch on these themes. Nor did it reference skills development in low-emissions industries, investment in circular economy initiatives, or support for nature-based solutions. These omissions don’t signal opposition to those sectors, but they do reflect a limited focus in terms of industry policy.
Environmental investing often follows cues from public investment and government priorities. A clear indication that these sectors remain a priority—even if only mentioned—can give confidence to capital looking for local deployment.
Fuel Excise and Broader Market Signals
The most tangible policy announced was the proposed halving of the fuel excise. For many households and small businesses, this may offer helpful relief in managing costs. For environmental investors, however, it sends mixed signals.
Fuel excise reductions lower the relative cost of petrol and diesel, which can slow momentum towards alternative transport solutions and lower-emission logistics. While the measure is framed as temporary, it adds another variable to investor outlooks in the transport and mobility sectors.
Crucially, it also doesn’t assist Australians who have already transitioned away from fossil fuels—such as electric vehicle owners or those using electric fleets. That distinction matters to investors assessing long-term behavioural and market shifts in transport infrastructure, fleet management, and consumer preferences.
The Bottom Line
The 2025–26 Budget Reply offers targeted relief in several important areas. But for environmental investors, it provides little guidance on future policy direction, transition support, or green economy priorities.
The absence of reference to net zero, clean industry, or low-emissions innovation doesn’t necessarily signal a reversal of existing momentum—but it does reflect a limited focus on environmental sectors in the current economic narrative.
As a result, private capital may need to maintain the pace without the benefit of strong policy tailwinds—at least in the near term. For now, environmental investors may need to look elsewhere for clarity, alignment, and leadership in the transition economy.
This is a choice they will make on May 3, 2025.
References
Liberal Party. “Budget in Reply” Peter Dutton 27 03 2025 https://www.liberal.org.au/2025/03/27/budget-in-reply
Important Information
EnviroInvest Pty Ltd ACN 685 107 957 (“EnviroInvest”) is an Authorised Representative of Daylight Financial Group Pty Ltd ACN 633 984 773 (“DFGPL”) which is the holder of an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFS Licence No. 521404).
Information in this commentary is current as at date prepared unless otherwise stated. However, please bear in mind that investments can go up or down in value, and that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. For more Important Information please refer to the Disclaimer section of this website.
This communication may contain general financial product advice. It has been prepared without taking into account your personal circumstances, and you should therefore consider its appropriateness in light of your objectives, financial circumstances and needs before acting on it.
If our advice relates to the acquisition or possible acquisition of a particular financial product, you should obtain a copy of and consider the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) before making any decision.